|
|
Claudio Diatto, Turin 1953.
After the degree at "Accademia Albertina" Art School, Diatto attends the School of Architecture at the
Polytechnic Institute of Turin. At the beginning of the eighties he
is on a training process in France: first in Antibes at Fersen
Gallery directed by the American Judith Fox, then in Paris at Le
Breton Gallery in rue Dauphine, eventually in Nogent-le-Rotrou at
Saint-Jean National Museum. Since the nineties he has been living
and working in Dogliani, tenaciously looking for an iconic code
inspired by the rythm of Langa's
landscape. This complex path, always pursued by the artist with a
deep passion, merged in 2009 into the paper cut series of the
Fertile Hands cycle: valuable
papers first cut and then painted. Because of these papercuts, in
2011 he has been invited to two solo exhibitions in China, in
Beijing and Tianjin. Through joyful and colourful neopop pictograms,
the content of Diatto's works aims at reinforcing the concept of art
seen as a therapy against angst and as a recreational attitude to
convey the inalienable relationship between Man and Nature.
POETRY OF SHADOWS
Shadows have been fascinating Diatto for a long time. From the
eighties on, he started feeling and responding to the personal need
to simulate shadows on canvas.
At the beginning of his work the shadow is a mellow one, just
outlined, merely suggested. It underlines forms, it moves them from
the background and leaves them floating in the space. With the
transition to Diatto�s �ingenuous� period, the shadow becomes
sharper and more and more geometric, let�s say more �ingenuous�
itself.
During the last ten years, the realization of this need led Diatto
to approach Tom Wesselmann�s teachings, Roger W. Sperry�s studies
and Betty Edward�s theories. All these ideas stimulated, encouraged
and supported him in his own research and pushed him to develop his
skill to emphasize through his works the intuitive perception of
contrast between shape and shadow, and between fullness and
emptiness.
Cutting out the pictorial form is a natural evolution of this path,
the answer to the need of bringing the form out of the
two-dimensions of the canvas and to provide the pictorial fiction
with a dignity tied to reality.
By cutting into the space Diatto creates a shadow that is clear,
sharp, real, that is not only the shadow of the object, but also the
shadow of the story: a shadow which is another story in itself. From
this perspective, the shadow becomes to Diatto more important than
the cut itself, and the cut becomes in a certain way functional to
the shadow that it casts.
In the end, emphasizing the shadow is the answer to another call:
the need of representing the dreams that anyone pursues, the hopes
that we all nourish. There is the little man who captures the moon
and the stars and there is the dreamer who loves his mermaid. And
there is the overall shape that allows us to capture the fleeting
shadow so that it can keep on existing for a long time, evolving and
changing in front of us, in front of our eyes.
© Raffaella Gallo, 2012
POETRY OF SYMBOLS AND FORMS
The butterfly, the lovers, the fruit basket all are signs and
forms of a speech. The star, the moon and the little man all are
signs or symbols of a speech. These are the forms and symbols that
together create a long story, a tale which is as long as life
itself. A single tale, a single text which has countless variants
that Diatto has been making during his life, with obstinacy, or
let us say, with method. And Diatto has always been working with
method and living with method. When I say with method I mean by
setting a problem, the different ways of research, the path to
follow in the research. Behind the seeming diversity there is a
pillar in Diatto’s thought, a pillar he never gave up on.
And this is not only about the colors he uses. Of course they are
important, an artist could be tempted to say: colors are all. But
for Diatto it is not like that, it is not simply like that. For
Diatto the research, the path to discover seems to be predominant
(we will further on go back to the topic of the path, which is so
important in Diatto’s work). It is a research that prevails
on what has been searched, as if in the forms, in the symbols and
in the colours, Diatto has been looking for something else.
It is plain that Diatto’s painting – and this word,
painting, is by itself misleading, because his art is not only
about painting – captures us beyond the simple esthetical
considerations. Those obviously are not irrelevant, but are not
enough. What captures us is the method. It is what we catch
together and through the method.We were dealing with the forms:
the butterfly, the fertile hand, the fruit basket or the lovers
are for Diatto “noble holders” of the tale that they
contain, a tale which is always the same and always different. The
little man, the tree, the moon all are symbols, characters of a
human play that “keep on repeating as a mantra” in a
narration which is always new. But it is in the woods, which
Diatto defines as the “main symbol”, that we find a
summary of his poetry. It is in the forest, in the trees’
texture, that we can find the meaning and the reasons of the
research, that we can find the method. A forest is thick, matted,
and can either be cozy or scary. In the woods, trees come up,
grow, die, the branches interweave and create an overall, wide
pattern. A forest is a text. After all, the etymology of the word
“text” refers to the Latin verb
“téxere” which means “weave”, and
this leads to “textus” which means
“fabric”. A text/forest as a set of threads, of
pictorial textures and linguistics lines help us to “not
lose the thread”. And it is in the text/wood that Diatto
places the little man who constantly unravels a red thread and
through that thread holds the moon and the stars. It is in the
woods, the “main symbol”, that the little man, as a
Homer’s hero, tells us the essence of Nature, the last
protector of a saviour dream in which man can rediscover his place
in Nature itself. But the Nature Diatto refers to is not the one
prevailing in a certain kind of [Italian] communication, in which
anything lately has become “eco”: “ecocompatibile” or environmentally friendly, “eco ambientale” or environmental awareness, “eco turistico” or ecotourism, a communication where trash itself has
been transformed into “ecoballe” or ecological bales. Diatto’s Nature is not a
convenient Nature or an in-fashion one. On the contrary, his
little man in the woods shows the material dimension of natural
experience. He shows an individual experience that transforms
itself into a collective one. In the woods the little man tries to
put together spirit and material, individual research and shared
values, because the forest is a text in which to look for
meanings, a text is a forest where one can find values. Forests
are, in these Diatto works, the essence of Nature, the one that we
are wilfully outraging. That forest, that little man in the woods
both tell us we are tied to the same destiny (here is again the
thread’s topic), that we will save ourselves or we will die
together.In that forest one can find oneself or get lost. Because
it is in the woods that there are those that Martin Heidegger
refers to as “holzwege” or “blocked paths”, small tracks that begin
and end in the woods and that we have to follow, since we are in
the woods. A forest is Life and the holzwege represent our search
for the meaning of life. The
holzwege are our soul’s
paths, they are doubt and faith, fear and happiness, reason and
instinct. Diatto’s
holzwege are the research, which
is clearly an individual research, because Diatto’s little
man is alone and everyone has to go his own path, but this
doesn’t mean that it is a solitary search. The little man
goes into the woods, enters and walks, a walk that sometimes means
losing himself. But, as Descartes said, if we walk in a straight
line we will be able to get out of the woods. And if to do so, to
get out of the thick forest we will need guides and guardians, we
will have to carefully look around, to look inside ourselves. If
the awareness, the sense of which path to take, rises from an
individual search, then in the precious words of Plato, who
answered to those who asked him who were the Guardians’
protectors: “Themselves, because before guarding the others
you have to learn how to guard yourself”.
© Carlo Turco, 2012

torna su
Copyright � Claudio Diatto
Nessuna parte di questo sito pu� essere riprodotta in alcun modo
senza autorizzazione scritta.
No part of this site may be reproduced in any way without written
permission.
|
|

|
|
|